Predictions for the fate of the world are dire. According to
scientists on the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the temperature
will rise 2.7 degrees by 2030, and that can lead to catastrophic floods,
droughts, wild fires, and food shortages throughout the world. Most of those
things already occur in our country. We’ve witnessed unprecedented hurricanes,
downpours of rain, and fires.
The simple sounding solution to the problem requires that
all of us drastically reduce carbon emissions. The difficulty with that is most
folks love their cars too much to give them up, and they don’t want to give up
the convenience of throw away packaging made of plastics. Our immediate comfort
is more important than keeping this planet in a state that will sustain life.
I remember the past and don’t want to go back to it.
However, we might learn a couple of things from that simpler life. The first
deals with recycling. Yes, that activity has been going on for a long time.
These days, we throw plastic containers in recycling bins, and the materials
are re-used to produce other items. That is a logical step since it takes
approximately 450 years for a plastic bottle to completely degrade.
In an earlier time, most bottles were made with glass. The
price charged for soft drinks included a deposit on every bottle. We boys used
to walk the ditches on Ball Camp Pike in search of ones that had been tossed
from passing cars. We’d return them to the store down the road and collect a
few cents with which we bought candy or bubble gum.
A huge dent could be made in the garbage that is produced if
companies returned to the use of glass bottles and deposits on them. In 2010,
25.7 billion cases of Coca-Cola were produced. Just think of the amount of
energy demanded to produce the plastic bottles for even a fraction of them, and
think of how many bottles have been discarded in dumps where they will exist
for the next four centuries. Returning glass containers makes more sense in the
overall scheme of things.
Energy demands increase yearly. Our thirst for electricity
to run appliances, televisions, and chargers requires plants to release more
pollutants into the atmosphere. Not so long ago, air conditioning was a luxury
that few homes had. Now, we all have it and rarely leave its comfort. I’m not
necessarily calling for a return to electric fans and open windows, although
both could be used during spring and fall seasons. Instead, I suggest that
folks
If we are to survive, one thing holds true: we must develop
vehicles that run on something other than gas. Many electric cars already
travel the highways. Our citizens must demand that manufacturers produce these
vehicles so that they can travel longer distances. Yes, we might also insist
that those electric cars have more appealing body styles.
The average passenger vehicle coughs out 4.6 tons of carbon
dioxide into the atmosphere each year. Multiply that by millions of cars we in
the U.S. own, and some idea of the problem comes into view.
We are choking
ourselves, other animals, and plants to death with our cars. Car manufacturers,
like cigarette companies, have addicted us to gas-guzzling vehicles, and
deciding to rid ourselves of them will be an enormous problem. However, the
alternative is that in the near future, our lives will become miserable as all
sorts of disasters befall us. If the threats that are predicted are real, the time is short to make even a modest
No comments:
Post a Comment